Which principle is illustrated by Tim and Rebecca's North Africa case study?

• A. Planting the gospel as a movement within existing households and communities
• B. Building independent churches before reaching households
• C. Forcing converts to abandon family ties
• D. Isolating new believers from their communities

Answer: (A)

The main idea being tested is planting the gospel as a movement within existing households and communities. In Tim and Rebecca's North Africa case, the growth comes from engaging people where they already live and operate—within families, neighbor networks, and local social circles—rather than erecting separate church structures first. This approach allows disciples to multiply through their own relationships, staying connected to their context and earning trust more quickly. Leadership develops from within these networks, and new believers often continue to participate in their daily communities, which strengthens sustainability and relevance.

Why this is the best fit: it shows the gospel spreading through intimate, existing social units and networks, generating organic growth and a durable movement rather than creating isolated, separate congregations from the outset. It aligns with a relational, contextual strategy that respects family and community ties, making it easier for people to respond and remain integrated.

Why the other options don’t fit: starting with independent churches before reaching households goes against the movement model of multiplication through social networks; it creates barriers between new believers and their communities. Trying to force converts to abandon family ties contradicts the relational, contextual approach and typically hinders trust and ongoing engagement. Isolating new believers from their communities likewise undermines the natural pathways through which movements grow.